Kilian Feldbausch vs Johan Nikles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent second serve performance analysis, Nikles has outperformed Feldbausch, securing 43.68% of points compared to Feldbausch's 40.58%. How does this impact the match outcome? Players with a stronger second serve often have a strategic edge.
• Examining return game stats, Nikles is slightly ahead, winning 47.61% of second serve returns against Feldbausch's 47.13%. However, Feldbausch excels in first serve returns with 35.07%, compared to Nikles's 32.52%.
• Under pressure, Nikles demonstrates better breakpoint saving skills, managing to save 51.66% of breakpoints, while Feldbausch saves 45.22%.
• In a broader performance overview, Feldbausch has achieved a 60% match win rate in the past year, whereas Nikles follows closely with a 58.82% win rate.
• Considering surface performance, Feldbausch excels on Clay (winning 58% of the time), while Nikles shows a preference for Hard surfaces, securing 62% wins. Can these surface preferences influence their success in this match?
• Looking at the level of competition, Feldbausch has contested matches largely in Challenger/ITF tournaments, winning 51.52%, whereas Nikles has thrived in Futures/Satellites/ITF events, winning 61.7% of his games.
• Facing higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 325.88), Nikles has confronted more challenging competition compared to Feldbausch, whose average opponent rank is 414.28.
• If the match advances to a deciding set, Nikles has a marginally better record, winning 50% of such sets, while Feldbausch has a 47% success rate.
• In terms of breakpoint conversion, Nikles again surpasses Feldbausch, converting 41.33% of opportunities versus 37.13% achieved by Feldbausch. Can this make a difference when crucial points are at stake?

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance and strengths of both players, it is clear that Nikles holds several advantages over Feldbausch. His superior second serve performance and breakpoint conversion rates provide him with a tactical edge, enabling him to gain and maintain momentum during crucial stages.

While Feldbausch shows strength in first serve returns and has proven consistent on Clay, Nikles's overall adaptability on Hard surfaces might play a decisive role, especially if the match were to be held on this surface type.

Nikles’s record against higher-ranked opponents and his better success rate in deciding sets suggest a robustness that could be vital in tightly contested moments. These factors combined with his ability to handle breakpoint situations more effectively suggest that he is better positioned for success.

Considering these facts, Nikles is the likely favorite to win the upcoming tennis match against Feldbausch.